asterix

*Am working on figuring out the best way to render Devanagari. For now, transliteration...sorry. Namaste.
Showing posts with label asana. Show all posts
Showing posts with label asana. Show all posts

Thursday, June 7, 2018

Breathe, Just Breathe...(Yoga Sutras 2.49-55)

In our last episode, we found out the unsettling, though grounded truth that ãsana according to Patañjali does not hold much sway in the overall picture of Yoga, and is certainly not the same sort of physical gymnastics that dominates the shalas of today. However, it is nonetheless highly significant as it is still an important means, though not the ends, for achieving Samãdhi. Without the proper foundation with ãsana, one could not move on to the fourth limb of Yoga, which is Prãnãyãma, or yogic breath control.



Although there is the tendency these days to say that the 8 limbs of Yoga, or the ashtanga of Patañjali, can be taken in any order, that is not entirely true either. They may not be literally one step after another, but there are verbal clues along the way as we shall see (and have seen), that do key us into the fact that we do need to have some things under control before moving on to the next, as we see with Prãnãyãma.

Having said that, and we will return to it, I do contend that Yamas and Ni-Yamas are to be practiced continuously for one simple reason...we are human, and humans are prone to being...well, human, and as the saying goes: to err is human... And, this is precisely why the Yoga Sutras are just that, human. At several times along the way, Patañjali says that we WILL falter and we WILL have obstacles and so forth. But, instead of staying down, we are to get back up and try it again, for a long period of time, with a diligent practice, namely abhyãsa, and Book II has been all about building our practice. Now that we are closing in on the final limbs of the 8-fold path, it bears repeating that these are not to be considered one-and-done events.

Just because we may be successful at one time in being filled with ahimsã or satya or asteya, does not mean that we shall ALWAYS be in such a state of being. In other words, it takes time. It takes effort. It takes patience. It takes being willing to fail and try again. It takes diligence. It takes reverence. It takes humility. It takes a lot. And, in the world of Veruca Salt where we all "want it now!" that is sometimes a jagged pill to swallow.

And, the modern Yoga world is not always as forgiving as it likes to present itself as you may have noticed. Although there is great talk about "non-judgement" and "universal love" reality in the world of mats and incense is not always so kind. It is quite a familiar experience to come across many a yogi or yogini who espouses some high ideals of this "non-judgement" and "ubiquitous love", but when one slips or falters, as Patañjali says again and again we shall...the judgement is often swift, hypocritical and long-lasting. 

When met with just such attitudes of non-gratitude, which you will, then it is best to remember Luke Skywalker's words again, "Breathe, just breathe..." which is where we are now at with 2.49.

Having left off with the fact that ãsana (a steady, meditative seat) can lead to the release from dualities and opposites, we then read:


Tasmin sati shvãsa-prashvãsayor-gati-vicchedah prãnãyãmah 2.49


When that (effect of ãsana) occurs, there is a distinction of movement in the exhalation and inhalation, called Prãnãyãma.

The tasmin sati is an unmistakeable verbal and grammatical marker that Prãnãyãma comes after the command of ãsana as it is a temporal locative absolute, which means that x happens and then y, and in this case, that means x=ãsana and y=prãnãyãma

Again, this is when ãsana is strictly meant to be a meditative seat. In modern practice that is indeed more ãsana-based from the physical sense, we can use breath control to go deeper into a pose, and it becomes symbiotic rather than in stages. But, that is to add a modern interpretation, which is fine, so long as we do not quote Patañjali as saying this is the case. What is in the text is that after ãsana comes prãnãyãma, and as we will see, after prãnãyãma comes pratyãhãra...in successive stages.

[Quick note on the word prãnãyãma as it is a bit interesting. It is actually made up of several components: pra + <<an>> + ã + <<yam>>. Prãna, or life force/breath is pra + <<an>> and the root "an" is what comes into modern languages from Latin as the Soul, namely anima/animus and so forth.]



Moving on to 2.50-51, we see:

Bãhyãbhyantara-stambha-vrittih desha-kãla-samkhyãbhih paridrishto dirgha-suksmah 2.50

Prãnãyãma is manifested by long or short distinctions by time, place and counting and is the movement of the external, internal and restraining [of the breath].

Bãhyãbhyantara-vishaya-ãksepi caturthah 2.51

The fourth [type/mode of Prãnãyãma] refers to the range of the internal and external breath.

Both the text itself and the commentaries do not shed much light on the 4 types of Prãnãyãma, and to make matters more challenging, there is a pervasive mis-translation of ãksepi being "transcending" or "goes beyond", where as it means "referring to" or "hints at" or the like. So, 2.51 seems to be a bit redundant, or it means that the fourth type is about different types of breathing?? Again, this is one of those times that is not very clear in the text and/or commentary. In short, it seems that the breath control or regulation of prãnãyãma then can focus on: time, place (in the body), counts and range of breath. Note to self for a bit more investigation into this...

Then, we have another verbal marker that once x happens, then y can...However, there is one slight problem as we see in 2.52-53:

Tatah kshiyate prakãshãvaranam  2.52

Then/at that time, the concealment of clarity is destroyed.

Dhãranãsu ca yogyatã manasah  2.53

And, the suitability of the mind in acts of fixed concentration.

This seems somewhat straightforward, 

BUT!! Taken together as a single sutra, we get:

Then, the concealment of clarity is destroyed within acts of fixed concentration and the suitability of the mind (arises)!

The "ca" conjunction meaning "and" is tricky here as to what is linked by it. Because it follows dhãranãsu, normally we would then take everything before the "ca" to be 1 and everything afterwards to be 2, hence it makes much more sense to link these two sutras as one, continuous complex sentence. Moreover, the plural locative of dhãrana-->dhãranãsu makes it more logical to say that the concealment of clarity is destroyed by/within ACTS of intense, fixed meditation here. This is reminiscent of Bhagavad Gita 2.50's definition of Yoga as:
tasmād yogāya yujyasva
yogaḥ karmasu kauśalam


Which means: 
Therefore, "yoke" yourself to Yoga, as Yoga is skill in ACTIONS. Usually this is translated as "skill in action", but it is clearly, as is here, plural and should be actions, just like above needs to be "acts of dhãrana". 

What this implies is again the caveat that Patañjali gives us again and again, namely...this is not a one-and-done deal. It takes time and multiple actions...Practice and refinement take TIME.

And, what this is also doing is setting us up for the triad of samyama, or dhãrana-dhyãna-samãdhi that we will see in detail in Book III (another dubious division...). 

For now, however, we have one more limb to deal with before moving to that trinity, and that is pratyãhãra, or withdrawal (of the senses). And, we will again see that now-familiar "tatah" marker meaning, then/at this time, signaling one thing happens before the next. 

To wrap up Book II and the first 5 limbs then, we read:

Sva-vishaya-asamprayoge cittasya svarupãnukãra ivendriyãnãm pratyãhãrah  2.54

Pratyãhãra of the senses is like an imitation of the true nature of the mind in the absence of contact with its own sensory objects.

Tatah paramã vashyatendriyãnãm  2.55

Then/at that time, it is/arises the ultimate command/control of the senses.

As with ãsana, then, there is not much to say. In fact, for as much attention the 8 limbs get in the modern-day Yoga world, there is surprisingly few words spent on some of the key concepts. More so, they are just common-sense guidelines that lead to the more esoterica such as Samãdhi and Kaivalyam, to which most of Books III and IV will be devoted.

Before moving onto the nominal section of Book III, though, it is important to pause again and consider that although the Yoga Sutras were written +/- 2,000 years ago, they are still highly applicable to a contemporary Yoga practice, and, moreover, are very pertinent and practical psychological tools that we can use to overcome daily obstacles. However, it then also needs to be reminded that when we do apply the Yoga Sutras to our 21st-century lives and Yoga practice, we do need to take the responsibility to acknowledge what is and what is not in the original Yoga Sutras, especially as teachers! There is a great deal of misinformation, miscommunication and consequently misusage of these powerful words. And, when that happens, and the veil or concealment of clarity is lifted as with the effects of Prãnãyãma, then there can be disillusionment instead of revelation. 

And, with a little bit of common sense, we can avoid that disillusionment and avoid the hypocrisy and judgement that often accompanies it.

So, again, before moving back into the meta-physical, remembering the first 5 anga/limbs, we need to exhale, exhale, exhale....

Inhale...














Monday, June 4, 2018

Nice Ãsana... (Yoga Sutras 2.46-48)

Okay, for many, this post is going to be a disappointment...Why? Because the vast majority of the modern Yoga world believes that Yoga is and has always been based upon the physical aspect of the ãsana and consequently misuse, misquote and unfortunately mistranslate Yoga Sutra 2.46 (and by extension, 2.47-48). So, if you don't want your view of ãsana as the core of Yoga to be challenged, you can skip this post (or, pose) and continue on as you were...Or, you can join me here to see what Patañjali actually says and how it fits into his concept of the ashtanga of Yoga.



As always, You May Leave if You Wish...

And, so here we are.

Yoga Sutra 2.46 is a sticky subject because you will have people contorting themselves into ashtavakrasana and the like to try and prove that Yoga has for "thousands of years" been around in the form that we know it today. K. Pattabhi Jois's assertion that the Surya Namaskar was found on an ancient palm-leaf scroll has long-since been debunked, inter alia, and yet, it is highly pervasive within the Yoga word that ãsanas are the path of Yoga...I'm sorry to say, this is just not true.

Even as a strong advocate of the physical aspect of Yoga (ãsana practice is indeed part of my daily life), I will not agree with what is simply not there. The concept of "Yoga" has been around for thousands of years, but in many, many different iterations and contexts, and 99% of the time in ancient scripts and references, it is primarily referring to the mental, spiritual or meta-physical, not the physical.

So, if you are still with me, and are still curious as to what Patañjali actually says, let's take a look at this/these troublesome passages, beginning with 2.46, though which we shall also soon see, is probably not the complete Sutra...but, don't shoot the messenger!

And, the shot heard around the world is:

sthira-sukham-ãsanam  2.46

This is most commonly translated as: Ãsana (posture) should be steady and comfortable...

However, this is not really what is going on.

sthira-sukham is a compound, not a dual, which is what would be necessary here for this translation. Rather, it is more logical with the Sanskrit construction to translate this as:

Ãsana (sitting) is comfort (sukha) in stability (sthira).

Um, wait a second! Why sitting? Because  mnemonically, the verbal root <<ãs>> literally means to sit on one's ...

And, why not steady AND comfortable? Because, grammatically, sukham agrees with ãsanam and is modified by sthira...seriously. We cannot know the case of sthira, but most likely it is: locative (in), genitive (of), dative (by/from) or instrumental (with)...giving us candidates such as:

comfort in stability
comfort of stability
comfort by/from stability 
comfort with stability

It absolutely does NOT mean a physical posture that we know today such as Natarajasana (as much as I admire that pose) at least not in Patañjali's time. It could only mean a seated position, fit for meditation. Period. There are no and's if's or but's about this. The concept of ãsana as a posture does not come around into the Yoga parlance for nearly 1,000 years with the advent of Hatha Yoga from the 15th-century (Patañjali is at least 1,000+ years before) haṭhayogapradīpikā, or, Light on Hatha Yoga, where actual ãsanas are enumerated and described, but again, nearly all of them are seated positions.

To complicate things, we then move to 2.47, which opens up a whole new can of worms...

prayatna-shaithilya-ananta-samãpattibhyãm 2.47

which at first glance gives us:

By way of absorbing the mind in the infinite/cosmos and relaxation of effort. 2.47

Fine, except for one thing...it is a pretty convincing argument that 2.46 and 2.47 are actually only ONE sutra, not two. Why?, the trembling power yogi/ni might be asking right about now... Again, because it makes sense both grammatically and logically...so, let's put them together as:

By deep meditation of the Infinite and relaxation of effort, ãsana becomes comfort in stability. 

In other words, when one becomes intensely absorbed in meditative thought, releasing the physical exertion, the seated position of meditation becomes a source of comfort in its rooted stability...

Which then leads us nicely into 2.48:

tato dvandva-anabhighãtah  2.48

or,

From this/then, one is not afflicted by duality.  2.48

Hello??? What's that?? Not afflicted by duality? Isn't Yoga based upon a dualistic system of thought???

Ummm, it is starting to look more and more like it is not, especially as we are again moving towards the synthesis of Samãdhi and the singularity of Kaivalyam...

In short, Yoga was not founded upon the basis of physical ãsanas, and, the way the wind is blowing, according to Patañjali's own words...it is looking more and more like advaita, or non-duality, as duality is again based upon avidyã, and once we achieve viveka, or discretion, that duality falls away through the process of dhyãna, or intense, singular meditation...

And, so, Patañjali gives very little attention, space, consideration and word count to ãsana, and it does not actually become a significant aspect of Yoga for another 1.5k years...

But, remember, as Luke Skywalker says, "Breathe, just Breathe..."